Assassin Creed Revelations
Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood
Battlefield 3
COD: Black Ops
COD: Modern Warfare 3
Dirt 3
FIFA 12
Forza Motorsport 4
Gears of War 3
Ghost Recon Future Soldier
Halo Reach
Madden NFL 12
Marvel vs Capcom 3
MLB 2K11
Mortal Kombat
NHL 12
Street Fighter x Tekken
Super Street Fighter 4
Tekken 6
Starhawk
Uncharted 3
BF: Bad Company 2
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Halo Combat Evolved
League of Legends
Minecraft
Nexuiz
Quake III
Quake Live
StarCraft II
Team Fortress 2
Tribes Ascend
Unreal Tournament 99
FEAR 3
Homefront
Mario Kart
General Discussion
General Banter
BF Players (XBOX, PS3, and PC) - Prized Event Size
TG Biggy wrote:
would like 12 vs 12 for consoles and 32 vs 32 for PCI doubt that you will ever get 32 members to compete on a regular basis. Scheduling alone would be a nightmare for the team leaders to attempt plus you would need a team of over 32 people in case members are unable to make it. I wish that it were far more likely because the idea behind it sounds awesome but from a logistical standpoint I have run multiple competitive squads and it is hard enough to get 5 or more guys to have schedules that match up and can make all the matches. I think that optimistically 12 would also be very fun, but 4v4 gets the squad dynamics and teamwork going really well too.
Excuse me for reply on old thread 
12v12 conquest BF3
12v12 is the way, the maps are just to big to play with less players! and 12v12 is the only way since there are no private servers and you have to fill a full server!
Even if there were private servers i still would only like to do 12v12. the game is just not made for less players. We've done 6 of these 12v12 conquest so far and all were epic games!
Some ppl say that 12 is a lot for some clans, but since battlelog's around recruiting is very easy!
12v12 conquest BF3
12v12 is the way, the maps are just to big to play with less players! and 12v12 is the only way since there are no private servers and you have to fill a full server!
Even if there were private servers i still would only like to do 12v12. the game is just not made for less players. We've done 6 of these 12v12 conquest so far and all were epic games!
Some ppl say that 12 is a lot for some clans, but since battlelog's around recruiting is very easy!
°
JettsonBE wrote:
Excuse me for reply on old thread12v12 conquest BF3
12v12 is the way, the maps are just to big to play with less players! and 12v12 is the only way since there are no private servers and you have to fill a full server!
Even if there were private servers i still would only like to do 12v12. the game is just not made for less players. We've done 6 of these 12v12 conquest so far and all were epic games!
Some ppl say that 12 is a lot for some clans, but since battlelog's around recruiting is very easy!
Support! 12vs12 for PS3
8 vs 8 anything smaller just aint true battlefeild
There is only one true KungFuM0NKEY and his alligance lays with the united legion
KungFuM0NKEY wrote:
8 vs 8 anything smaller just aint true battlefeildPrivate servers would make everything so much easier...
-HAYHA
BF3 Game Director
Hayha wrote:
Private servers would make everything so much easier...-HAYHA
BF3 Game Director
Yeah, I don't know what's up with the servers. There were a whole bunch of empty servers to do battles on.
But then the day the "TAo 12v12 conquest" starts the servers are down???? I allmost start thinking DICE keeps competition away on purpose, they might have a huge deal with VG to keep competition off all major ladder/competition websites so VG can host all the competition holding a monopoly. After VG is done they can even make us pay for our own clan-servers (like on pc). It a likely scenario!
EA/DICE is still a company looking for nothing else than PROFIT!
Think about it, why would they give the public private servers wich only 10% (maybe not even) is gonna use. Meanwhile clans on battlelog (they made a clansection for a reason) are begging for private servers.
Make all clans pay for their private servers and EA/DICE has a WIN/WIN scenario!
OR.......I'm just parranoide
JettsonBE wrote:
Hayha wrote:
Private servers would make everything so much easier...-HAYHA
BF3 Game Director
Yeah, I don't know what's up with the servers. There were a whole bunch of empty servers to do battles on.
But then the day the "TAo 12v12 conquest" starts the servers are down???? I allmost start thinking DICE keeps competition away on purpose, they might have a huge deal with VG to keep competition off all major ladder/competition websites so VG can host all the competition holding a monopoly. After VG is done they can even make us pay for our own clan-servers (like on pc). It a likely scenario!
EA/DICE is still a company looking for nothing else than PROFIT!
Think about it, why would they give the public private servers wich only 10% (maybe not even) is gonna use. Meanwhile clans on battlelog (they made a clansection for a reason) are begging for private servers.
Make all clans pay for their private servers and EA/DICE has a WIN/WIN scenario!
OR.......I'm just parranoide
Servers are coming; read this: EA moderator replied.
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/forum/threadview/2832654624856188389/3/
Since im a PS# player, if its possible to increase the online multiplayer (most likely not) and make it 24 vs 24, and make a map with no limits (out of bounds, except the spawn areas ofc) and have an all out war =) if not that. then a JET ONLY war lol 
I have not seen 12 vs 12 TDM (Hardcore) ladder...I think that would be great!
I would love to have time to do this! Just got so much going on at the minute in my life and not to mention finding some good team based players to do it with... 
Collective instrumental work from the Anderson brothers...