Assassin Creed Revelations
Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood
Battlefield 3
COD: Black Ops
COD: Modern Warfare 3
Dirt 3
FIFA 12
Forza Motorsport 4
Gears of War 3
Ghost Recon Future Soldier
Halo Reach
Madden NFL 12
Marvel vs Capcom 3
MLB 2K11
Mortal Kombat
NHL 12
Street Fighter x Tekken
Super Street Fighter 4
Tekken 6
Starhawk
Uncharted 3
BF: Bad Company 2
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Halo Combat Evolved
League of Legends
Minecraft
Nexuiz
Quake III
Quake Live
StarCraft II
Team Fortress 2
Tribes Ascend
Unreal Tournament 99
FEAR 3
Homefront
Mario Kart
Game Director(s): {C-oPs}Canny|FN|
Subject: Squad Rush rules
Ok just been looking at your squad rush rules and i think they seem little unfair.
Currently in a tie the attackers have to just destroy one m-comm station now that just seems unfair.
I think gamebattles had the squad rush rules down to a T.
3 maps generated first to destroy 4 m-comms wins.
Both teams have to play attack then defence so if your team attacked first and you get to 4 m-comms you have to then defend to stop the other team trying to get 4, If both teams get 4 then you keep playing tie breakers in the order of the 3 maps till you have a clear winner.
Letting both teams have a chance seems alot fair than the way it is now, I am amazed that some one has not bought this up already.
Currently in a tie the attackers have to just destroy one m-comm station now that just seems unfair.
I think gamebattles had the squad rush rules down to a T.
3 maps generated first to destroy 4 m-comms wins.
Both teams have to play attack then defence so if your team attacked first and you get to 4 m-comms you have to then defend to stop the other team trying to get 4, If both teams get 4 then you keep playing tie breakers in the order of the 3 maps till you have a clear winner.
Letting both teams have a chance seems alot fair than the way it is now, I am amazed that some one has not bought this up already.
Give me some quotes of the rules you think should change.
DBL
DBL
DBLDeathDealer wrote:
Give me some quotes of the rules you think should change.DBL
This is your current rule for tie breakers
- In the event of sudden death, when the scores are tied the attacking team win on the next M-COM the goes or if defended for 20 tickets on 1 M-COM, defending team win.
this is how i think it should be seems alot fair.
Well the tie breaker rule i would change, I would have it that both teams have to play attack then defend and the team who destroys most m-comms wins.
For example
In the tie breaker team 1 attacks first destroys only 1 m-comm
Team 2 attacks seconed and destroys both m-comms.
Team 2 wins.
If its tied still then you play the next map that was generated by FN till you have a clear winner.
also this rule should be changed as it conflicks with another rule
- The MCOM is not to be destroyed intentionally by any means other then a plant or Demolition 2.0
becuase this rule says you can not destroy it with demolition 2.0
- Demolition 2.0 to take an M-COM out is a legal move through using C4, RPG's on the building etc
You should just say if an m-comm is destroyed in any way other than arming it then you fall fit that m-comm and no point is awarded.
Any other aspects you think could do with a change to make things better or more fair?
The rest of the squad rush rules seem fine, Not checked the conquest rules yet but that should be straight forward 
Just noticed i posted this in the PC section it should be in the xbox 360 section.
I think that if the attacking team destroys the objective any other way besides arming it, a point should be awarded to the defending teams score. That, I believe, is the way GB has it which seems very fair.
°